Peer Review Process

All manuscripts received will undergo a peer review by at least two reviewers within a double-blind review framework. The final decision regarding the acceptance or rejection of a manuscript is made by the Editor-in-Chief, based on reviewers' comments presented during the editorial board meeting. To ensure originality, all manuscripts are screened for plagiarism using Turnitin software.

THE REVIEW PROCESS:

• Selection: Manuscripts selected by the editorial board will be formally submitted to the designated reviewers.

• Timeline: The review process is conducted within a predetermined timeframe (averaging one month). If additional time is required, reviewers must notify the editorial secretariat.

• Compliance: During the review process, reviewers must adhere to the journal’s official style and formatting guidelines.

• Substantive Review: Reviewers shall meticulously examine the manuscript's substance to ensure the clarity and accuracy of the information presented.

• Citations and References: Reviewers are responsible for verifying the consistency and appropriateness of in-text citations in relation to the reference list/bibliography.

• Recommendations: Reviewers provide written notes and clear recommendations to the authors for the improvement of the manuscript.

• Submission of Results: The results of the review are submitted to the Editor-in-Chief or Managing Editor by completing the official Review Form.